USPTO serial 79051625
STINGRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3612612Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 28, 2009
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with STINGRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Burlingame
Robert B. Burlingame Amplitude IP182 Howard Street, #2Calendar/Docketing DepartmentSan Francisco, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras [ ; camera components for scientific and industrial image capture and image processing, namely, camera connection cables, lenses, LCD and tube video monitors for image processing, video printers for computers, video printers for digital cameras, remote controls for cameras, developed, recorded and downloadable software for the integration of cameras for electronic image capture and image processing, camera housings, camera filters, lighting devices for cameras, namely, electric lamps, flash bulbs, flashlights with light emitting diodes for use in photography, optical reflectors ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Vision Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Vision Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Vision Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named STINGRAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |