USPTO serial 79051658
KEGBOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KEGBOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dortmund 44143, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Containers made of metal for the transport and storage of beverages, beer, drinks and other liquids, liquid food, and liquid products of all kind, namely, barrels, kegs or tins of tinplate or aluminum with standardized connection valves produced by whole or partial deep-drawing techniques | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines for breweries and the beverage industry, namely, machines for cleansing, filling and capping containers, barrels or kegs; machines for cleansing, filling and capping containers; machines for transporting and palletizing containers such as kegs and kegs with standardized connection valves, namely, palletizers, fork lifts, industrial robots, conveyors, conveyor belts, and belt conveyors; machines for filling of kegs having standardized connection valves with liquid; automatic industrial labeling machines for applying labels to containers and packaging machines for kegs having a standardized connection valve | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Containers made of plastics materials or synthetic composite materials for the transport and storage of beverages, beer, liquids, liquid food, liquid products of all kind, namely, kegs with a standardized connections valve manufactured by deep-drawing or stretch-molding/blowing techniques | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services including engineering consulting services regarding planning, installation, operation, inspection, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and demolition of machines for the beverage industry and breweries, such as machines for cleaning, filling and capping, and machines for transport and palletizing kegs and kegs with standardized connection valves; engineering services regarding planning, installation, operation, inspection, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and demolition of machines for the production of kegs with standardized connection valves formed of metal or synthetic materials by deep-drawing or stretch-blowing/molding; design and development of computer programs for the data processing of information in direct connection with afore-mentioned services and engineering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |