Drawing for FLORAHOLLAND

USPTO serial 79051680

FLORAHOLLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLORAHOLLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP38500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 100Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management; business administration; office functions; business intermediary services in the field of selling agricultural, horticultural and forestry products and grains, including products for ornamental plant cultivation; holding auctions for agricultural, horticultural and forestry products and grains, including products for ornamental plant cultivation; advertising and sales promotion; business organization management and business economics consultancy; market research and analysis; provision of trade information; compilation and managing of databases; organizing of exhibitions and fairs for commercial purposes; lobbying for commercial purposes for the benefit of the ornamental plant cultivation sector, namely, promoting the interests of ornamental plant cultivation companies in the fields of politics, legislation, and regulationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 4, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 4, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 23, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 3, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 3, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 3, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance