Drawing for MSP

USPTO serial 79051686

MSP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554448Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MSP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia A. Cigelnik

1037 CONCORD CIRMUNDELEIN, IL 60060-2543UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electronic ignitions for combustion engines in vehicles; electronic ignitions for combustion engines in machines in power plants; electronic ignitions for lean burn gas combustion engines in machines; [ glow plugs; ] spark plugs; ignition distributors for vehicles, power plants and lean burn gas engines; [ internal combustion engine parts, namely, ignition coils for use in vehicles, machines in power plants and lean burn gas engines in machines; ] spark plug connectors in the nature of spark plug wires; spark plug ignition wires; and component and replacement parts for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
042Scientific research in the field of ignition systems and spark plugs; technological consultation in the field of ignition systems and spark plugs; engineering in the field of developing ignition systems and spark plugsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 18, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 29, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 27, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 27, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 19, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 3, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance