Drawing for VH VORTEX HYDRA

USPTO serial 79051766

VH VORTEX HYDRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3619532Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 12, 2009
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VH VORTEX HYDRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

Mark Lebow Ladas & Parry1700 Diagonal RoadSuite 505ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for manufacturing and preserving roof tiles; systems for the productions and preservation of roof tiles comprising extruder for roof tiles, racker and deracker for roof tiles, curing chambers of roof tiles, packer for roof tiles, dryer for roof tiles, packaging machines [, hydraulic presses, machines, namely, varnish mixers ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 27, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 7, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 7, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 12, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 2, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 12, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 9, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 1, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance