Drawing for HEELS & CO

USPTO serial 79051804

HEELS & CO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEELS & CO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025FootwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 7, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 27, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jun 26, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 1, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance