USPTO serial 79051818
Serial No. 79051818
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3661036Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 2009
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79051818?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-1096 AX AMSTERDAM, NL
HN AMSTERDAM, NL
NL-1096 AX AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Menker
JAMES R. MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER, P.A.PO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT AND COMPUTERS; ] BLANK SMART CARDS; ENCODED ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS AND SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO IDENTIFY THE USER OF THE CARDS AND FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF FACILITY AND BUILDING ACCESS, BANKING, EQUIPMENT SUPPLY AND TELECOM OPERATION; ENCODED ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS FOR USERS OF COMPUTERS AND MOBILE TELEPHONES; ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS FOR CARDS WITH MEMORY OR MICROPROCESSOR CHIPS; COMPUTER CHIPS; SILICON CHIPS, MEMORY CHIPS AND MICROPROCESSOR CHIPS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; PRINTED CIRCUITS, PRINTED ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS FOR CARDS WITH MEMORY OR MICROPROCESSOR CHIPS; ELECTRONIC MICRO-CIRCUITS; MICROPROCESSORS, SECURE MICROPROCESSORS; CARDS WITH INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; ELECTRONIC MICRO-CIRCUIT CARDS, [ ELECTRONIC WALLETS, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENABLING CONSUMERS TO MAKE PAYMENT IN ON-LINE PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS; ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS FOR COMPUTERS, CARD READERS, NAMELY, SMART CARD READERS AND CHIP CARD READERS; TELEPHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, RADIO FREQUENCY READERS, ELECTRONIC LABEL READERS, AND CASH OR ELECTRONIC TICKET DISPENSERS; SEMICONDUCTORS; ] ENCODED SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH PAYMENT FOR SERVICES; ENCODED SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED FOR BANKING; ENCODED SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED FOR CUSTOMER LOYALTY SERVICES; [ ELECTRONICALLY ENCODED CORPORATE ID BADGES BASED ON MICROPROCESSOR TECHNOLOGY; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED IDENTITY CARDS; TACHOMETERS, ENCODED SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING FOR USE WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES; ENCODED SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING FOR USE WITH PAYMENT OF PARKING TICKETS; ENCODED ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS FOR USE IN PAYMENT OF PARKING METERS AND CAR PARKS; ] SUBSCRIBER IDENTITY MODULE (SIM) CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED WITH MOBILE TELEPHONES AND TELECOM OPERATIONS [ ; ENCODED SMART CARDS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH PAYMENT FOR TV ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 12, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |