USPTO serial 79051825
OMEGAHONEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3744803Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2010
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with OMEGAHONEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Patterson Lakes, AU
Patterson Lakes, AU
Patterson Lakes VIC 3197, AU
Patterson Lakes VIC 3197, AU
Patterson Lakes VIC 3197, AU
Patterson Lakes, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Honey, honey products, namely, bee honey, eucalyptus honey, native bush honey, flavoured honey, creamed honey, table honey, yellow box honey, red gum honey, iron bark honey, stringy bark honey, alfaifa honey, clover honey, honeybee honey, buck wheat honey, comb honey, floral honey, whipped honey, polyfloral honey, monofloral honey, cotton honey, honey substitutes, glucose for food, honey and glucose mixtures, golden table syrup, maple syrup, molasses, treacle, flavourings, chocolate toppings, honey toppings, caramel toppings, sauces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mark Robinson
- Other trademarks owned by Mark Robinson
- Other trademarks owned by BRENDA ROBINSON
- Other trademarks owned by BRENDA ROBINSON
- Other trademarks owned by BRENDA ROBINSON
- Other trademarks owned by Mark Robinson
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named OMEGAHONEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |