Drawing for ESSA

USPTO serial 79051833

ESSA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3595068Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 24, 2009
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESSA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Garrett C. Donley

Garrett C. Donley FLSmidth A/SVigerslev Alle 77Global IPR ManagementValby, DK-2500

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mining machinery, namely, mining sampling equipment composed of rock and ore falling stream sample collectors, cross conveyor belt rock and ore sample collectors, cone rock and ore sample collectors, rotary chute vezin type rock, ore and slurry sample collectors; robotic and automated sample preparation systems comprising machinery for preparing ore and mineral samples for analysis in the nature of mining sample dividing machines; mining sample crushing machines; mining sample pulverizing machines; mining sample bead fusing machines for fusing ores; ring mills; mining sample dividing machines; mining sample crushing machines; mining sample pulverizing machines; sample preparation machinery, namely, crushers, jaw crushers, roll crushers and cone crushers; mills being machinery, namely, ring mills, hammer mills, disc mills, ball mills, bond index mills and grindability mills; mining sample dust collectors for collecting dust during rock or ore sample analysis; mechanical work stations for mineral processing comprising a hood, work bench, and ducting for forced ventilation; riffle splitters in the nature of a hopper with cross blades for splitting a flow of material into multiple streams; bottle rolling machinery; sieve shakers being machinery for sorting material by particle size; test sieves being machinery for separating material according to particle size; machines, namely, powder presses; pressure filtering machines for dewatering batches of slurry samples; mining sample machines for separating minerals by buoyancy; attritioning machines for reducing a particle size of an ore or mineral sample vibrating screen machines in the nature of vibratory screen separatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042[ Material testing services; metallurgical testing services; sample testing services; sample preparation services, namely, ore and mineral assaying, scientific or material testing consulting services for the mineral and natural resource industries, design of apparatus and equipment for the mineral and natural resource industries; laboratory design services; robotic design services; design of sampling equipment and laboratory equipment ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 23, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 9, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 15, 2016INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 4, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Nov 4, 2015PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Nov 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 11, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 1, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance