Drawing for PILÊO

USPTO serial 79051864

PILÊO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3692679Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 6, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PILÊO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum; Todd Hardy

NEIL F. GREENBLUM; TODD HARDY GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C.1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLACERESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk beverages with high milk contentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Biscuits intended, from their shape and composition, to be placed on cups before consumption, whether as cold, warm, salted or sugared drinks; bread, pastry, confectionery, namely, fondants and fruit jelliesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032Preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, soft drinks and sports drinksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
043Restaurant servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 20, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 6, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 13, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 13, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 1, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 12, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 1, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance