Drawing for PELCROMA

USPTO serial 79051894

PELCROMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3608993Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 21, 2009
Examiner
MANOR, THOMAS M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PELCROMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott L.L.C.50 South 16th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19102-2516UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for colour merging for use in the textile, leather and paper industry; computer software for colour standardization for use in the textile, leather and paper industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Processing of data by computer, systemization of information into computer databasesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Consultation services in the field of colour standardization in the textile, leather and paper industry; consultation services in the field of colour merging in the textile, leather and paper industry; providing software and computer databases, namely, colorant databases for use in the textile, leather and paper industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 5, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 21, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 20, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 1, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance