USPTO serial 79051901
FAVEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3807099Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAVEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, athletic shorts, athletic vests, bath robes, bath slippers, bath wraps, bathing suits, beach dresses, beach hats, beach robes, beach shoes, beach shorts, beach wraps, bed jackets, bed socks, Bermuda shorts, bike pants, bikinis, blindfolds for wear, bloomers, blouses, bodices, lingerie, namely, bodices; body dresses, body stockings, body suits; body warmers in the nature of sweat suits; boxer shorts, brassieres, bridal gowns, bridal headwear, bridesmaid's gowns, briefs, cami-knickers, camisole, chemise tops, chemise, cocktail dresses, corselets, corsets; lingerie, namely, corsets; culottes, dresses, dressing gowns, evening gowns, flip flops, footless socks, footless tights, foundation garments, garter belts, garters, girdles, gym shorts, gymnastic suits, half length tights, halter tops, hats, head scarves, hockey shorts, hockey skirts, hold up stockings, house coats, house dresses, Japanese kimonos, jogging bottoms, jogging tops, jump suits, kaftans, knee high stockings, knickers, leggings, legwarmers, leisure suits, leotards, lingerie, loungewear, maternity clothing, namely, pants; moisture vapour permeable clothing, namely, underwear; muffs, negligees, night caps, nightdresses, nightshirts, pantaloons, pantie-girdles, pants, petticoats, pajamas, riding underwear, shirts, outerwear, namely, shorts; sportswear, namely, shorts; underwear, namely, shorts; singlets, ski jackets, ski pants, ski suits, ski trousers, skull caps, sports hosiery, sports socks, stockings, surf shorts; surfing wetsuits; suspender belts, suspenders, sweatbands for the head, sweatbands for the wrist, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweat absorbent underclothing, swimming briefs, swimming caps, swimming costumes, swimming robes, swimming shorts, swimming suits, swimming trunks, T-shirts, tankinis, teddies, tennis dresses, tennis shirts, tennis shoes, tennis skirts, tennis socks, tennis trousers, thermal underwear, tights, trousers, vest tops, vests, wetsuits; component parts for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 11, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |