Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79051947?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79051947. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns GOURMANTE FOOD, THE MED WAY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79051947, the listed owner(s) include: M.D. QUALEATY PRODUCTS TRADING LTD, M.D. QUALEATY PRODUCTS TRADING LTD, M.D. QUALEATY PRODUCTS TRADING LTD.

What is USPTO serial number 79051947?

Serial number 79051947 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark GOURMANTE FOOD, THE MED WAY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of GOURMANTE FOOD, THE MED WAY?

GOURMANTE FOOD, THE MED WAY (79051947) currently shows USPTO status code 404 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover GOURMANTE FOOD, THE MED WAY?

The public record lists International Classes: 029, 030, 031, 033. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 79051947

GOURMANTE FOOD, THE MED WAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3749889Status 404

Filing date: Nov 15, 2007
Status date: Nov 15, 2017
Registration date: Feb 16, 2010
Examiner: MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOURMANTE FOOD, THE MED WAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacob Laufer

JACOB LAUFER LAUFER & ASSOCIATES1660 60TH STREETBROOKLYN, NY 11204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	Fish; preserved fruits and vegetables; jams; compotes; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
030	Rice; bread; pastry; chocolate; biscuits; honey; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
031	Fresh fruits and vegetables	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—
033	Alcoholic beverages except beers	SECTION 71 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 8, 2018	DENC	NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED	—
Jun 8, 2018	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
Jun 30, 2017	INNT	TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB	—
Jun 13, 2017	INTS	TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB	—
Jun 13, 2017	INPC	INVALIDATION PROCESSED	—
May 23, 2017	INTR	TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED	—
Sep 23, 2016	C71T	CANCELLED SECTION 71	—
Feb 5, 2013	FINO	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jun 9, 2010	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Jun 9, 2010	FIMP	FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED	—
May 16, 2010	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Feb 16, 2010	R.PR	REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 1, 2009	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Dec 1, 2009	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2009	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Oct 23, 2009	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Oct 22, 2009	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 22, 2009	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Oct 22, 2009	GNEN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 22, 2009	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 22, 2009	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Oct 13, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 13, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 13, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2009	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Oct 1, 2009	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Sep 11, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2009	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 25, 2009	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Mar 6, 2009	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Mar 6, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 6, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Mar 3, 2009	PGRR	PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED	—
Feb 24, 2009	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Feb 22, 2009	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2009	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Feb 12, 2009	UNDN	UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN	—
Jan 29, 2009	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Dec 30, 2008	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2008	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2008	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2008	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Dec 9, 2008	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2008	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2008	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
May 12, 2008	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
May 12, 2008	RFRR	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU	—
May 11, 2008	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
May 10, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 2, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
May 1, 2008	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—