Drawing for PHYTOGREEN

USPTO serial 79051988

PHYTOGREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYTOGREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

Gary D. Krugman SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Plant extracts for use in cosmetics; soaps, perfumery, cosmetic products, milks, creams, lotions, gels, dentifrices, shampoos, bath products, namely gels, effervescing bath tabletsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
005Plant extracts for use in pharmacy and dietetics for medical use; pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary products, dietetic substances for medical useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Plant-based flavoring extracts for foodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2012DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 21, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 11, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 10, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 14, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 14, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 1, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance