Drawing for RISING STAR

USPTO serial 79052002

RISING STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RISING STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; trunks and travelling bags; attaché cases; bags; rucksacks; satchels; wheeled bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; clothing for animalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Gymnastic and sporting articles, not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 20, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 12, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 1, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance