Drawing for ETC

USPTO serial 79052076

ETC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3631556Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 2, 2009
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ETC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Alspaugh, Esq.

John H. Alspaugh, Esq. Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek750 B Street, Suite 2100San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Centrifuges; gas centrifuges; centrifuges for uranium enrichment ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Construction of uranium enrichment plants and uranium enrichment facilities; construction project management of of uranium enrichment plants and facilitiesACTIVE—
042Custom design of centrifuges, gas centrifuges and centrifuges for uranium enrichment for others; design of uranium enrichment plants and facilities; engineering project management; product research and development services relating to centrifuges, gas centrifuges, centrifuges for uranium enrichment and uranium enrichment plants and facilities; scientific research and development services relating to uranium enrichment plants and facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 17, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 25, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 17, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 14, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 12, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 15, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 13, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 13, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 12, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 2, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 8, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance