Drawing for NINE BELOW O CHARDONNAY

USPTO serial 79052079

NINE BELOW O CHARDONNAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3749890Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 16, 2010
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NINE BELOW O CHARDONNAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tom Fitzsimons

Tom Fitzsimons Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.300 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2500Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine; table wines; sparkling wines; fortified wines; drinks, namely, wine cooler; wine-based alcoholic beverages, namely, aperitifs with a wine base; prepared wine cocktailsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 30, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 13, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 23, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 23, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 3, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 1, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 8, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance