USPTO serial 79052245
TECHNOLASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3608999Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2009
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TECHNOLASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Eilberg
William H. Eilberg William H. Eilberg, Esq.316 California Ave.No. 785Reno, NV 89509Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry and science; soldering and welding chemicals, metal soldering and welding products and preparations, namely, tempering chemicals for use in metal working or soldering; tempering chemicals and chemical preparations for use in soldering and welding, tempering chemicals for metalworking or soldering; metal hardening preparations, namely, metal plating chemical compositions; carbide powder for industrial purposes; carbide powder for laser hardfacing; carbide [ ; gases for welding and soldering ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | [ Common metals and their alloys; metal soldering and welding wires, rods of metal for soldering and welding, flexible metal cords for soldering and welding, metal welding rods and wires; ] metal powders used in manufacturing; hard metal coatings for metal parts in the form of weldable powder for use on metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Welding electrodes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Soldering, metal coating, coating of metal parts by laser welding, laser hardfacing ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOGENIA
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOGENIA
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOGENIA
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named TECHNOLASE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |