Drawing for KK

USPTO serial 79052284

KK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Anne Matheson

Julia Anne Matheson Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry; jewelry, namely, rings, key rings of precious metal, earrings and ear clips, cuff links, bracelets, charms, brooches, necklaces, tie pins, ornaments of precious metal, medallions; timepieces and chronometric apparatus and instruments, namely, watches, watch cases, alarm clocks; jewelry boxes of precious metals, their alloys or coated therewithSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Leather and imitation leather goods, namely, traveling bags, traveling sets comprised of matching luggage, trunks and suitcases, garment bags for travel, vanity cases sold empty, rucksacks, shoulder bags, handbags, attaché cases, document cases, briefcases, clutch bags, wallets, purses, key cases, business card cases and case holders, all of the foregoing made of leather or imitation leather; umbrellasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture, mirrors, picture framesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Kitchenware made of tempered glass, glassware, porcelain, and earthenware, namely, dishes, plates, carafes, and drinking glasses; dinnerware; beverage glassware; beverage wareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Textiles and textile goods, not included in other classes, namely, bed linen, table linen, household linen, towels, hand towels, mini-towels, washing mitts, bath sheets, bed sheets, fitted bed sheets, duvet covers, mattress covers, bed base covers, pillow cases, bolster casesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing and underwear, namely, jerseys, shirts, T-shirts, lingerie, belts, scarves, ties, shawls, waistcoats, skirts, raincoats, overcoats, braces, trousers, denim trousers, pullovers, dresses, jackets, sashes for wear, gloves, tights, socks, bathing suits, bath robes, pajamas, nightshirts, shorts, pocket squares; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, slippers; headwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 28, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 15, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 21, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 19, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 28, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 15, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance