Drawing for VIBRASS

USPTO serial 79052286

VIBRASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIBRASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Massage apparatus, vibromassage apparatus, lip massage apparatus, in particulary lip massage apparatus for players of brass and double-pipe wind instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
015Musical instruments, particulary brass and double-reed wind instruments; mouthpieces for musical instruments, vibration devices for attachable to the mouthpieces of musical instruments, adaptors for the mouthpieces of musical instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 2, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 6, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 18, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 15, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance