Drawing for THE ROADCASE INSTRUMENT PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79052386

THE ROADCASE INSTRUMENT PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3602753Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2009
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ROADCASE INSTRUMENT PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bill C. Panagos

Bill C. Panagos BUTZEL LONG, PC41000 Woodward Ave., Stoneridge WestBloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Drum transport casesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 15, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 13, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 9, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 31, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 28, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 8, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 17, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 15, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance