Drawing for HYTENS

USPTO serial 79052409

HYTENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYTENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Orlando

JOSEPH J. ORLANDO BUCKNAM AND ARCHER1077 NORTHERN BOULEVARDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Stainless steelSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 8, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 15, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance