USPTO serial 79052444
TOKEN VECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3889210Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2010
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOKEN VECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C.SUITE 1201900 CHAPEL STREETNEW HAVEN, CT 06510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for database management in the field of Brand protection, traceability, products and documents security; Computer software programs for generating product identification codes; Computer software for use in managing and governing access to databases,interrogating databases, and developing databases; digital imagery software, namely, computer software for use in the field of brand protection, traceability, products and documents security for processing images, organizing and viewing digital images, processing product identification images, namely, bar codes images and data matrices images; computer software for use in programming algorithms, namely, encryption processes and data encoding processes; computer software for generating and processing product identification codes, namely, bar codes, data matrices and confidential codes; computer software for generating product identification codes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made of these materials, namely, boxes, packaging, namely, blister card; cardboard and paper boxes, cardboard and tracing paper; printed matter, namely, books in the field of Brand protection, traceability, product security and documents security, stationery; non-fabric labels, namely, address labels, bar code labels, shipping label: printing blocks, printing type; photographs; adhesives material for stationery purposes, namely, adhesives for stationery purposes; pictures | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, providing technological and scientific information about brand protection, traceability, products and documents security, namely, information in the field of software and technology solutions for brand protection, traceability, products and documents security; industrial analysis and research services, namely, industrial design services; design and development of computer hardware and software | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Track And Trace (ATT)
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Track And Trace (ATT)
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Track And Trace (ATT)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TOKEN VECTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |