USPTO serial 79052460
CHOBI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHOBI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear including children's wear, blouses, briefs and pants, trousers, ties, gaiters, waistcoats, singlets, hosiery, hoods (clothing), mufflers, tights, coveralls, suits, bathing suits, jackets, tee shirts, bibs not made of paper, aprons (clothing); bathrobes; dressing gowns; peignoirs; gowns; fancy dress costumes; stockings; shawls; scarves; baby nappies; furlined coat; skirts; petticoats; outer clothing; gymwear; jerseys (clothing); knitwear (clothing); uniforms; overcoats; parkas; babies' nappies of textile; cloaks; gloves (clothing); pyjamas; bathing trunks; scarves; dresses; raincoats; head bands (clothing); ready-made linings (clothing accessories); jerseys; briefs and pants; braces; heavy boots; layettes; pullovers; shirts; bath slippers; sports shoes; gym shoes; slippers; rope-soled sandals; socks; half-boots; football boots; clogs (shoes); sandals; boots; hair slides; knitted caps; berets; caps; hats; headgear; caps; service hats; cap visors (headgear); shower caps; ear muffs (clothing) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |