USPTO serial 79052461
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sydney, NSW 2000, AU
Sydney, NSW 2000, AU
Sydney, NSW 2000, AU
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritive substances, namely, oils from fish in the nature of cod liver oil and nutritional oils not for food or cosmetic purposes; vitamin and mineral supplements; vitamin and mineral supplements in liquid or dry form; food products for infants, namely, food for infants, infant formula, baby foods; food products for invalids, namely, processed food adapted for medical purposes, protein reduced and gluten free food for medical purposes; dietetic foods adapted for medical use; medicated foods, namely, medicated candy, food for diabetics; dietary supplements; diabetic foods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jams; fruit sauces, namely, apple sauce and cranberry sauce; jellies; edible oils and fats; dairy based fat and protein fractions, namely, milk, butter, protein for use as a food filler, protein for use as a food additive, all for human consumption or use in foods for human consumption; milk and milk products, namely, cheese and yoghurt; modified milks, namely, evaporated milk, flavored milk, powdered milk; filled milk, namely, fermented milk, goat milk, milk curd; dairy based fat and protein fractions, namely, cheese, butter, milk proteins, all the above being goods which supply nutritional needs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Flour, namely, wheat flour and corn flour; preparations made from cereals and cereal preparations, namely, bread, bread rolls and buns, cakes, pastry and confectionery chips for baking; ices, namely, edible ices, flavored iced, fruit ices, ices and ice creams; yeast; sauces; biscuits; custard; farinaceous foods, namely, farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; food starch; food flavoring agents, namely, food flavorings; extracts used as flavoring; cream, namely, cream buns, cream puffs; ice cream; pasta | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beverages, namely, non-alcoholic malt beverages, smoothies, isotonic beverages, soft drinks; fruit juices; fruit drinks; vegetable juices; vegetable drinks, namely, tomato juice, carrot juice, celery juice, beetroot juice; soft drinks; horchata | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |