Drawing for MAGIC KINDER

USPTO serial 79052469

MAGIC KINDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGIC KINDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMITTING AND REPRODUCING SOUND OR IMAGES, BLANK RECORD DISCS, DIGITAL MEDIA, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES, CDS, DVDS, OPTICAL DISCS, HIGH DEFINITION DIGITAL DISCS, USB (UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS) HARDWARE, USB (UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS) OPERATING SOFTWARE, TRADING CARDS RECORDED ON COMPUTER DISCSACTIVE—
018LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER BAGS, SPORT BAGS, HANDBAGS, TRUNKS AND SUITCASES; UMBRELLAS AND PARASOLSACTIVE—
021CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE; CUPS AND MUGS, DISHES AND PLATES NOT OF PRECIOUS METALACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2010DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 5, 2010LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jan 5, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2009CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 15, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 30, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 30, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 15, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance