USPTO serial 79052469
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMITTING AND REPRODUCING SOUND OR IMAGES, BLANK RECORD DISCS, DIGITAL MEDIA, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES, CDS, DVDS, OPTICAL DISCS, HIGH DEFINITION DIGITAL DISCS, USB (UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS) HARDWARE, USB (UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS) OPERATING SOFTWARE, TRADING CARDS RECORDED ON COMPUTER DISCS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER BAGS, SPORT BAGS, HANDBAGS, TRUNKS AND SUITCASES; UMBRELLAS AND PARASOLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE; CUPS AND MUGS, DISHES AND PLATES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |