Drawing for DVG AUTOMATION

USPTO serial 79052510

DVG AUTOMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3612635Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2009
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DVG AUTOMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Costigan

Kathleen A. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.One Rockefeller Plaza, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Actuators of mechanical type, namely, linear actuators, electric valve actuators; actuators of pneumatic type and actuators of hydraulic type for valves, namely, pneumatic valve actuators and hydraulic valve actuatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 27, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 6, 2017FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 5, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 4, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 19, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 31, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 10, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 22, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance