USPTO serial 79052555
ZAPPA ENERGY BALLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZAPPA ENERGY BALLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
1493 Chain Bridge RoadSuite 300McLean, VA 22101Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |