Drawing for KIKUCHI JAPAN

USPTO serial 79052560

KIKUCHI JAPAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3627145Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 26, 2009
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIKUCHI JAPAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William S. Boshnick

William S. Boshnick Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Wood, namely, wood posts, wood trim, wood veneers, timberSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture, screens, folding screensSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 14, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 5, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 9, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 1, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 26, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 11, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 22, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance