USPTO serial 79052576
HARRY KROLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3658189Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 2009
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARRY KROLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Schrozberg, DE
Schrozberg, DE
Schrozberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER G. NIKOLAI
PETER G. NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A.900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing not of leather, not including footwear, namely, shirts, blouses, jackets, coats and waistcoats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 26, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |