USPTO serial 79052624
MILKINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3623138Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2009
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILKINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOREMARTEC S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SOREMARTEC S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SOREMARTEC S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SOREMARTEC S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MILKINDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 25, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |