USPTO serial 79052638
VISIOCORP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIOCORP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
Laurel V. Dineff Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 N. Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic apparatus and equipment, included in this class, namely electronic components and sensors, measuring, checking (supervision) and regulating apparatus, adjusting drives, in particular for motor vehicles, materials in the nature of connections for electric lines, cable sets, switches; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and/or images, in particular being apparatus fitted in motor vehicles; antennae, speakers, loudspeaker boxes, in particular for cars; electronic driving assistance systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lights, namely, electroluminescent lights and LED lights, air conditioning apparatus, in particular for motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles and parts thereof, namely, decorative parts and fittings of metal and/or plastic, handles and door pulls; tank flaps and vehicle fuelling systems, motor vehicle fittings, namely external mirrors, internal mirrors, window winding mechanisms, direction indicators, hub caps, ventilation blinds for the guidance of airflow, roof modules of glass and plastic glass, in particular for motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto in the field of internal and external mirrors, fueling systems, plastic molding, lacquering and assembly, and for lights of all kinds; industrial analysis and research services in the field of internal and external mirrors, fueling systems, plastic molding, lacquering and assembly, and for lights of all kinds; technical planning, consultancy and development, in particular for all components for internal and external mirrors, vehicle fuelling systems, in connection with plastic molding, lacquering, assembly, and for lights of all kinds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |