Drawing for IFLYTEK

USPTO serial 79052655

IFLYTEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IFLYTEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing apparatus; computers; identity cards; computer peripheral devices; computer software; couplers (data processing equipment); microprocessors; monitors (computer hardware); readers (data processing equipment); notebook computers; integrated circuit cards (smart cards); coin-operated apparatus; dictating machines; electronic tags for goods; computer measure oil machine; electronic notice boards; navigational instruments; telephone apparatus; video telephones; programme control phone exchange facilitySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 22, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 3, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 22, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance