USPTO serial 79052664
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Nippon Sheet Glass Company,; Limited
JP
Other trademarks owned by Nippon Sheet Glass Company,; Limited
Nippon Sheet Glass Company,; Limited
JP
Other trademarks owned by Nippon Sheet Glass Company,; Limited
Nippon Sheet Glass Company, Limited
Tokyo 108-6321, JP
Other trademarks owned by Nippon Sheet Glass Company, Limited
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. SCOTT ALPRIN
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 24, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |