Drawing for CIRCULATE

USPTO serial 79052669

CIRCULATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIRCULATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Michal

ROBERT P MICHAL Lucas & Mercanti, LLP475 Park Avenue South, 15th FloorNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical drinks for the treatment of the effects of free radicals, namely, having antioxidative effects, not containing the enzyme nattokinase; dietetic beverages adapted for medical purpose for the treatment of the effects of free radicals, namely, having antioxidative effects, not containing the enzyme nattokinase; medical infusions for the treatment of the effects of free radicals, namely, having antioxidative effects, not containing the enzyme nattokinaseSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee-based beverages, cocoa-based beverages, tea-based beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic fruit juices and fruit drinks, vegetable juice, isotonic beverages, mineral water, waters, namely, mineral water and aerated waters, whey drinks; powder and tablests for making carbonated drinks; essences and preparations in the nature of syrups for making drinks and beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 20, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 27, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 25, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 25, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 29, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 22, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance