USPTO serial 79052691
VESTAS NO. 1 IN MODERN ENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3818419Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2010
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VESTAS NO. 1 IN MODERN ENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigh Ann Lindquist
Leigh Ann Lindquist SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3200Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Windmills, wind power plants, wind turbines; parts and accessories therefore not included in other classes, namely, mill towers and masts, blades, blade hubs, mill housings, machine beds, rotation devices, yaw rings and gears; parts and accessories for windmills, wind power plants and wind turbines, namely, devices for setting the pitch of the wings, brakes and brake devices, main shafts, universal joints, transmission cases, clutches and electric generators and reserve wind power supply plants | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric and electronic apparatus for windmills and wind turbines, namely, data processing equipment and instruments in the nature of equipment for control, operation and surveillance, namely, computers, computer hardware and computer software; microprocessors and semi-conductors for controlling and monitoring constant voltage, frequency, phase conditions, rotor speed, efficiency and thickness of brake pads, temperature, wind direction and wind speed; vibration sensors for installation in mill housings; watt-hour meters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Erection, construction, installation, service, maintenance and repair of wind mills, wind power plants, wind turbines and other wind-operated machines; advisory, consultancy and providing information relating to all the aforesaid services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical assistance for other in the nature of consulting services relating to the design, development, planning, testing, evaluation and research of wind mill, wind turbine and wind power projects and effecting such projects; development and testing of wind mills, wind power plants, wind turbines, wind-operated machines, and components thereof; effecting research projects concerning wind mills, wind power plants, wind turbines and other wind-operated machines; advisory, consultancy and providing information relating to all the aforesaid services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vestas Wind Systems A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Vestas Wind Systems A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Vestas Wind Systems A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VESTAS NO. 1 IN MODERN ENERGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |