Drawing for SMOKECLOAK

USPTO serial 79052714

SMOKECLOAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3643684Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 23, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SMOKECLOAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Chen

David Chen IP ATTORNEYS GROUP, LLC16 Oxford Road, 2nd FloorMilford, CT 06460UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Smoke generating fluid for use with fog machinesACTIVE—
009Security, burglar and theft alarms; electronically triggered security and anti-theft device, namely, a device which emits a non-toxic visibility inhibiting vapor; security strobe lights, namely, flashing safety lights and acoustic alarm devices, namely, loudspeakers and electronic warning horns for use with security, burglar and theft alarm systems; personal security alarmsACTIVE—
011Fog machines, flashing strobe light apparatus, devices for generating smoke for signaling, fog machines for creating special theatrical effects, fog machines for creating atmospheric effects for training purposesACTIVE—
037repair, installation and maintenance of fog machines and security, burglar and theft alarm systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jun 14, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 6, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 21, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 27, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 23, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 24, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 22, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance