Drawing for ENTRACTE

USPTO serial 79052799

ENTRACTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENTRACTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Skins, hides, trunks, suitcases, umbrellas, whips and saddlery; wallets; change purses, handbags, backpacks, beach bags, travel chests, haversacks, purses, cases of leather or leatherboard, school bags, satchels, sling bags for carrying infants, card cases, traveling setsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 29, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 23, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
May 22, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance