Drawing for Serial No. 79052833

USPTO serial 79052833

Serial No. 79052833

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3612653Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2009
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79052833?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. Jeffrey B. Sladkus, LLC1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fresh, frozen and processed meat and meat products, namely, ham and prosciuttoSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 9, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 15, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 11, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 4, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 9, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 29, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 29, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
May 29, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance