Drawing for NIBK

USPTO serial 79052918

NIBK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3679887Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2009
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NIBK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Grace

David W. Grace Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Brake pads for land vehicles; brake shoes for land vehicles; brake linings for land vehicles [ ; suspension parts of vehicles, namely, coil springs, equalizers, leaf springs, sway bars ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 14, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 15, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 13, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Feb 25, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 5, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 23, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 8, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 23, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2009RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 29, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance