USPTO serial 79052994
ECO-EFFICIENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECO-EFFICIENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Lifting and transporting equipment, such as elevators, elevating apparatus, escalators and moving walkways, as well as components, parts and fittings, including automated doors, for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance, repair and modernization of all kinds of lifting and transporting equipment, such as elevators, elevating apparatus, escalators and moving walkways, as well as associated components for such equipment; installation, maintenance, repair and modernization of doors, gates and barriers especially automatic doors, industrial doors and automatic gates and barriers and their associated components and spare parts for such equipment as well as control systems, access control apparatus and installations and their parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2010 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |