Drawing for G GOLDEN FLYING FISH

USPTO serial 79053009

G GOLDEN FLYING FISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3647699Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 30, 2009
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with G GOLDEN FLYING FISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machines, namely, cultivators, harvestors, seeders, combines, tillers, windrowers, woodworking machines, namely, wood beating machines, wood chipping machines, wood drilling machines, wood grinding machines, wood milling machines, wood planing machines, wood sawing machines, electric food processors, diesel engines for machines, machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, centrifugal pumps, power transmissions and gearing for machines not for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 28, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 5, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 5, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 3, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 27, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 29, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance