USPTO serial 79053117
LITTLE ROOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3752382Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 2010
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITTLE ROOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
35325 Mücke, DE
HaPe International (Ningbo) Ltd.
315800 Xingqui, Beilung, Ningbo, CN
HaPe International (Ningbo) Ltd.
315800 Xingqui, Beilung, Ningbo, CN
HaPe International (Ningbo) Ltd.
315800 Xingqui, Beilung, Ningbo, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L. DENNISON Ladas & Parry LLP1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314-2700Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and toys for children and adults, namely, board games, action skill and target games, card games, parlor games, manipulative games; solitaire card games, namely, dexterity and skill games for a single player; gymnastic apparatus; sports balls; and Christmas tree decorations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HaPe International AG
- Other trademarks owned by HaPe International (Ningbo) Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by HaPe International (Ningbo) Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by HaPe International (Ningbo) Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LITTLE ROOMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |