USPTO serial 79053209
SXC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3850140Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2010
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SXC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and software used to provide service to users of mobile or embedded devices that may use private or sensitive resources, namely, providing access to the simcard and alternative smartcards, access to devices providing the local position of the user such as GPS or alternative devices, access to APIs allowing the opening and usage of external connections such as SMS, LAN operating software, LAN hardware, GPRs, UMTs or other next generation standards, WLAN and other IP-based connectivity, specifically excluding software relating to the pharmaceutical or pharmacy industries, including the administration of pharmacy reimbursement programs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation of computer security systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer security system monitoring services; computer programming, maintenance of software, implementation of software, updating computer software; development of software for secure network operations; provision of security services for computer networks, computer access and computerized transactions; quality control, quality control in the field of network and software security | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Università degli Studi di trento
- Other trademarks owned by Università degli Studi di trento
- Other trademarks owned by Università degli Studi di trento
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SXC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |