Drawing for LEMO

USPTO serial 79053247

LEMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554478Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LEMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK

JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP201 East Washington Street, Suite 1200Phoenix, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the manufacture of packaging, namely, packaging machines used for manufacturing bags of thermoplastics and blocked stacks of bags; printing machines for commercial and industrial use for printing rolls and bags of thermoplastics; laser welding machines, gas-operated welding machines, electric welding machines for welding thermoplasticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 26, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 30, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 19, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance