Drawing for RESPONSTOR

USPTO serial 79053275

RESPONSTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESPONSTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul E Milliken

9061 WALL STREET, N.W.MASSILLON, OH 44646-1676UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Cooling appliances and installations for perishable goods and bodiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 16, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 9, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 8, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 5, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 12, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 12, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 12, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 12, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 5, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance