Drawing for BETFAIR. BETTING AS IT SHOULD BE

USPTO serial 79053350

BETFAIR. BETTING AS IT SHOULD BE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3602775Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2009
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETFAIR. BETTING AS IT SHOULD BE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy H. Hiebert

Timothy H. Hiebert SAMUELS & HIEBERT LLCTWO INTERNATIONAL PLACE, 23RD FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110-4104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for playing gambling, gaming and betting games; computer software for increasing the speed of Internet web sites for gambling, gaming and betting; computer software for processing transactions on Internet web sites for gambling, gaming and betting; computer software for managing access to Internet web sites for gambling, gaming and bettingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
041Gambling and gaming services; gaming services, namely, providing online wagering services; online and telephone gambling and betting services; gaming services, namely, providing telephone wagering services; lottery services; betting exchange servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 24, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 15, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 15, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 13, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 8, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 18, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 16, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 12, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance