USPTO serial 79053371
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIZABETH H. COHEN
Elizabeth H. Cohen ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5344UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand-operated hand tools and instruments, namely, cutlery, forks, spoons, knives, penknives, non-electric choppers, butcher knives, mincing knives | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Lamps, floor lamps, LED lighting, namely, ceiling lights, wall lamps; apparatus for heating terraces, namely, electric space heaters, gas space heaters; baking ovens, namely, electric ovens, gas ovens, steam ovens, microwave ovens; fitted hot plates, namely, gas fitted hot plates, electric fitted hot plates, induction fitted hot plates, ceramic plates sold as parts of ovens, namely, ceramic fitted hobs, halogen fitted hot plates; electric grills; electric plancha griddles; cooking rings, namely, gas burners, electric burners; plate warmers, electric deep fryers; electric fondue pots; refrigerators, namely, refrigerated tables, electric wine cellars, refrigerated countertops; extractor hoods for kitchens, namely, ventilation hoods; water fountains, electric kettles; air-conditioning apparatus and installations; freezers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Non-electric stew pans; non-electric stew pots; non-electric woks; non-electric cooking pots; non-electric deep-fryers; non-electric kettles; decanters; wine buckets; champagne buckets; ice buckets; kitchen ladles; household utensils, namely, spatulas; non-electric coffee mills and spice mills; salt and pepper mills; corkscrews; unworked and semi-worked glass, except glass used in buildings; porcelain and earthenware mugs, bowls, salad bowls, dishes, plates; bottles sold empty; works of art made of porcelain, terra-cotta and glass; dust bins; glasses, namely, jars, drinking glasses, champagne flutes; tableware, namely, plates, dishes, bowls, salad bowls; salt and pepper shakers, trivets, not of precious metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 20, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |