Drawing for HALLDE

USPTO serial 79053523

HALLDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3567958Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 27, 2009
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HALLDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Josh A. Partington

Josh A. Partington Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC11730 Plaza America Dr. #600Reston, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric food processors; electrical food blenders and mixers; electric food choppers; cutters, namely, food cutting machines; machine parts, namely, blades; parts and tools for the aforementioned machines sold as a unit with the aforementinoed machines and sold separately as replacement parts, namely, cutters, slicers, julienne cutters, shredders, combination cutter mixers, dicing grids, potato chips grids, french fry grids, wall racks and feedersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 11, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2019PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jan 25, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 9, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 13, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 8, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 9, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance