USPTO serial 79053539
ALLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamin supplements, albuminous foodstuffs for medical purposes; baby food; dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; food for babies; food preparations adapted for medical purposes; mineral food-supplements; health food supplements; herbal preparations for medical purposes; herbal medicines; dietary substances for medical purposes; pharmaceutical preparations, dietetic substances adapted for medical use, vitamins, minerals and mineral supplements; nutritional supplements; herbal remedies and unguents, mineral preparations and supplements, nutritional supplements including concentrated dried fruit extracts fortified with vitamins; herbal supplements | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Aromatic preparations for food; candy for food; carbohydrate-based food preparations being dietetic supplements or nutritional additives (not for medical purposes); dextrose for food; essences for foodstuffs (except etheric essences and essential oils); farinaceous food pastes; farinaceous foods; flour for food; foods farinaceous foods; glucose for food; gluten for food; processed grains for use in food; groats for human food; gruel, with a milk base, for food; malt extract for food; molasses for food; oat-based food; potato flour for food; salt for preserving foodstuffs; snack foods cereal-based; starch for food; starch products for food; tapioca flour for food; thickening agents for cooking foodstuffs; turmeric for food; herbal tea | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |